Saturday, November 24, 2012

My Thoughts on the CoRec Basement

Finishing the CoRec basement is a hot topic for the Council and for residents. It’s no secret that I am opposed to finishing the basement at this time, but it’s not because I don’t care about the needs of our children (I have four kids ranging in ages from 18 to 1) and it’s not because I don’t recreate. I do see the benefit of having additional recreational opportunities for our residents and I wasn’t opposed to using recreation impact fees and/or CARE tax funds for the basement. However, the recreation impact fees are now gone and we only have approximately $100,000 in CARE tax money, which doesn’t come close to the money needed to complete the basement. My concerns with using unrestricted funds for this are based on the following reasons.

1. Financial forecasting
I am waiting to receive a forecast of our financial needs for the next 5-7 years. I don’t believe in making big financial decisions without financial forecasting and I’m concerned that, as a Council, we don't have a clear idea of what needs we should be budgeting for over the next five years. Earlier this year we hired Bowen, Collins, & Associates to perform a utility rate analysis for us. In this analysis they state “based on the current plan [of increasing utility rates], the City will need to draw approximately $1.1 million from reserve funds to cover expenditures in the first four years of the plan before it is paid back in later years. It is recommended that the City verify it has adequate reserve funds to cover this need.” Recently, we’ve been told that our golf carts need to be replaced, which is not something we planned for. These are two things we know of, but what of those things of which we are not aware? What other needs does our City have over the next five years that we should be budgeting for and that we can pay for with unrestricted funds? I don’t have an answer to this question as of yet. Our financial director is working on this analysis for us. I am hesitant to spend unrestricted funds until we have a better understanding of our financial needs.

2. Profit/Loss on current programs
I am waiting to receive a copy of a profit & loss analysis for the current recreation programs and the Grill and this is something our finance team is working on. I’ve been told that our current recreation programs and the Grill are losing money, but I don’t know how much. In the 2013 budget we assumed both would break even and we will have to budget amend if either will need a subsidy due to losses. It is still early in the fiscal year and things may change; however, I’m hesitant to add more recreation programs if our existing programs are losing money. If we increase our costs (which finishing the basement will do) and continue to lose money then it stands to reason that the needed subsidy will also increase. I would prefer to first implement the suggestions from residents and the Golf Course Finance Advisory Committee on ways to increase revenue and see if we can get closer to breaking even before spending more money on something that is losing money.

3. Already over budget
From what I’ve been able to tell after reviewing agenda minutes and talking with residents, the original approval for the CoRec was to spend $2.1 million, then it increased to $2.5 million. In the end with changes and updates the total cost was closer to $2.9 million. The intent of the building was to function as a clubhouse, a recreation center, and an events center. It feels now like the message is in order to really make it work for all three, we need to spend another $300,000 - $500,000 to complete the basement and then it will be profitable and serve all three functions. We’ve already spent a considerable amount of money to accomplish this and residents were told that the current center would  function as an events and recreation center. I feel we should allow more time to work out the scheduling conflicts before assuming we have to spend more money, especially as it is already almost half a million dollars over budget.

4. What is the potential?
We are told that there is a conflict between recreation and events as only one thing can be happening at the facility at a time, but if we finish the basement then we can have recreation and events occurring together. Maybe this is true and there is an opportunity cost to be considered by only having room for one or the other. However, I haven’t seen an analysis that realistically shows what the potential is. We couldn’t ask an investor to invest in our business by simply stating that we were going to have 1,000 new clients by the end of the year. We would need to show an understanding of the industry, our competitors, the market share, what was working and what wasn’t, and explain how we were going to meet that number. I’m not aware of an analysis showing what potential our CoRec has for events. How many events do other Utah County golf courses hold? How many receptions does the new center in Pleasant Grove hold each year? Are other golf courses realizing a profit when hosting events and tournaments? If we are going to be in the business of running an events center, then it’s time we start thinking like a business. I know that many businesses lose money before they begin to realize profits. However, we need to have a plan in place and an understanding of the business we are in before we are spending more money to accommodate more events.

5. Is this what residents really want?
Unfortunately, due to legal expenses we had to cut the Decisions Survey that was to be completed this year. I would’ve liked to ask about the basement as a portion of it is for a cardio room and a includes a plan for spin classes. Reading through the Decisions Survey done during FY 2011 there were two questions that stand out to me. The first was “Should the City provide adult recreation programs?” In that survey, 35% were in favor and 60% were against. The other question was “If adult programs were provided, would you participate?” 29% said yes and 65% said no. Additionally, we’ve had residents reach out to the Council expressing a desire for more park space. Our unrestricted funds can be used for anything, and after reviewing the last Decisions Survey and hearing from residents I’m not sure that the CoRec basement is something on which we should spend unrestricted funds. We did hold a townhall meeting to discuss this but there less than 20 residents who provided input during the public comment portion. It would be nice to hear from more residents on this issue.

Again, I am not opposed to recreation or the facility we currently have. As a mom, I appreciate all of the things the City does to make this a family-friendly community. I also realize that we are lucky to live near several other cities that also have recreation programs where my children can participate. I have thought over this topic for months and I’m just not at the point where I feel comfortable spending unrestricted funds without first resolving the five points listed above. I do realize I stand alone on this issue and I will support whatever is ultimately decided by the Council, but I felt it important to share my concerns so residents understand why I feel we should not finish the basement at this time.

Council Meeting - November 20, 2012

Work Session

Presentation by YCC on Santa’s Workshop Toy Drive
This program allows local families in need to pick up toys and other presents for their children for Christmas. The YCC meets with local bishops to get recommendations of families who may benefit from this program. All of the money that is raised from fundraisers throughout the year go towards this program, as well as toy donations from families. Last year the YCC helped 30 families. This year the YCC has raised approximately $500. The YCC encourages families to donate new or gently used toys to this program. Donation boxes will be located at the Public Works Building, the Community Recreation Center, Deerfield Elementary, and Cedar Ridge Elementary. Cash donations can be made at the City Office. Pizza Pie Café is having a special fundraising activity for Cedar Hills. Bring in your Pizza Pie card on Nov 27th, 28th, 29th, Dec 4th, 5th, or 6th and 25% of your order will go to help this program.

Discussion of Winter Activities on Golf Course
There have been several suggestions to have other winter activities on the golf course. The golf manager came to discuss his concerns and recommends not doing this. After talking with other courses and doing research he has determined that this causes a lot of damage to the course. He contacted the superintendent of Wasatch State Park as they do allow winter activities on their golf course and was told they sustain a lot of damage each year. Skiers don’t stay on the trails and the snow compact turns to ice, which damages the greens. He also spoke with a course in Idaho that allows other activities and was told they spend $5,000-$8,000 each year on repairs.

The previous golf director used to have snow removed from the course in the winter in order to have more rounds of golf played. Our current management recommends we do not continue this practice as the course benefits from having several weeks to recuperate. The recommendation was made that we identify other areas where residents can participate in winter activities and that the Council approve an official policy prohibiting sledding and other activities on the course. This will be continued to the next meeting.

Council Meeting

Public Comment
Marisa Wright – Wants to see the CoRec basement completed. Says only one resident at the townhall regarding the basement was against it after expressing fiscal conservatism. She is upset that the City settled with UVHBA. Some members of the Council have told her that now that the recreation impact fees are gone the basement can be completed with CARE tax funds and unrestricted general funds. Feels the basement needs to be completed to make the golf course break even operationally. Says the CoRec is the difference between a town and hometown. Doesn’t know why anyone would be against it unless they don’t recreate.

City Reports
David Bunker – Received bond ratings from Standard & Poor and Fitch. Both agencies rated the City at AA-, which is a very good rating. With both agencies giving us the same rating we will get a better refinancing rate on the GO bond. Interest rates are low right now so it is a good time to refinance.

CM Martinez – YCC working on Santa’s workshop. On December 10th the City will be hosting a winter event at the CoRec. Santa will be there to see the kids and we will be serving hot cocoa. Hours will be 5pm-8pm. The Grill is recommending new winter hours of 8-5 with the grill portion only operating from 11-2. Food that will be served during the other hours will be soups, salads, and premade items. This recommendation is due to financial losses. December 7th will be the last day of regular hours.

CM Augustus – The Planning Commission met to discuss the Dimond Subdivision, kennels and catteries. Attended a North Pointe Solid Waste board meeting and tipping fees will be increasing about $3 per household per year. Looking at changing access as it is very busy on Saturdays. He continues to work with draftsperson on plans for the CoRec basement.

Mayor Gygi – Met with three council members regarding goals and visions. Will meet with the other two soon. Will present overall goals for January.

CM Rees – Issued two press releases and getting more likes on Facebook. Working with CM Martinez on December 10th event.

CM Zappala – Working on emergency plan for the City. Attended a board meeting for Utah Valley Special Service District. They are having issues hiring qualified people and are also looking for a new location. Mentioned Highland, Saratoga Springs, and Santaquin as possible locations. Working on a request for bids.

Recognition of Golf Course Finance Advisory Committee Members
As not all of the members were able to be present this item has been postponed.

Review/Acton to Approve Final Plat for Dimond Subdivision A
This is a proposed two lot subdivision located at 4000 West and 9486 North. The subdivision will consist of the existing home and a new lot. This subdivision originally received approval about two years ago and has gone through the Planning Commission again. Still need to submit water rights and a storm water protection plan. Plans include utilities to the new lot. This was approved.

Review/Acton on Water Conservation Plan Update
The State and the Division of Water Resources require that we update this plan every five years. Our current outdoor use is moderate to high and we need to develop some education materials for residents to reduce water consumption. We do not currently meter our PI usage, but it would cost approximately $1.5 million to install a metering system, plus higher O&M costs for replacement and maintenance. We haven’t looked at providing incentives to cut down on water use, but staff is open to this. Staff would like to create a water conservation committee to address this and other conservation issues. The new Water Conservation Plan was approved.

Discussion on Golf Cart Lease Agreement
Wade (golf director) went through each of the carts to review was is needed and determined that about half of our golf carts will not have enough battery life to get through the next season. He recommends we replace the carts. If we were to fix the issues with existing carts it would cost $36,000-$40,000 the first year and the same amount for the second year. This is in addition to the approximately $50,000 in cart maintenance costs over the next 24 months on the current fleet. He doesn’t feel it makes sense to spend that kind of money on used carts. Feels it makes more financial sense to sell the bad carts and get a lease for new carts. He has received several bids and the price is about $6,200/month for a four-year lease for the new carts. The four year lease includes a full warranty for the four years. We had previously been told that we could expect each cart to last eight years but Wade feels a more realistic expectation is four years. We’ve had issues with carts dying on the course and golfers having to be towed back to the clubhouse. We also had an instance where a golfer was injured after the brakes didn’t work on a cart. Mr. Gonzalez (cart maintenance technician) stated there is also a cost of labor and parts to continually be fixing broken down carts. This was a discussion item only so no decision was made.

Discussion on Cedar Hills Champions Program
I had been approached by a resident who wanted to recommend another resident as a Cedar Hills Champion. This section is on our website but was never an official program. I would like to implement this program and recognize a resident each quarter. I will work with David on drafting the parameters for this program and it will be on a future agenda.

No executive session was needed.

Council Meeting - November 15, 2012

Council Meeting

Public Comment
Nobody signed up for public comment.

Review/Action on Settlement Agreement with UVHBA
In April, the UVHBA filed an action against the City regarding the collection and use of impact fees for recreation facilities. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the parties agree that no liability has been established and that by settling, the City does not admit to any wrongdoing. The Council unanimously agreed to pay $175,000, which is approximately the amount of recreation impact fees that had not yet been spent, and reimburse attorney’s fees in the amount of $15,000. More information can be found by reviewing the City’s press release at http://www.cedarhills.org/node/1790.

Review/Action on Ordinance Repealing Recreation Building Impact Fee
In association with the settlement agreement with UVHBA the City agreed to suspend and repeal the assessment and collection of the recreation facilities component of the park impact fee. The new ordinance repealing the collection of this impact fee was unanimously approved.

Review/Action on Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
Before the reconstruction of North County Blvd began the County agreed that certain municipal improvements needed to be installed in 4800 West. These improvements include a 12-inch culinary water line, a relocated sewer meter vault, the construction of a new sewer outfall line and metering vault to allow sanitary sewer flows to enter the TSSD mainline in 1100 East in American Fork, and water and sewer lines stub-outs in the undeveloped commercial properties east of 4800 West. Our portion of these improvements comes to $310,054.40, which is 60% of the overall cost and our portion of the overall usage. The other 40% will be paid by American Fork, which represents their portion of the usage. Adding the stub-outs now means we will not have to tear up the road to install these utility lines when commercial businesses start development in our commercial area. The funds will be allocated from capital improvement and impact fees according to the construction schedule. This was unanimously approved.

As the Council had an executive session prior to the meeting to discuss legal items there was no need for an additional executive session.