Work Session
The
Council and staff took a tour of the CoRec to where the expansion plans will take
place.
Council Meeting
Public
Comment
Don
Brown - Lives in Bridgestone community. Sewer line goes down to retention basin
and he is concerned about the depth of sewer line being buried. City engineer
didn't have this line on the city drawings. When connecting they stopped this
line and he went without water for 2-3 weeks. Now there is a new unit going
into Bridgestone and he is concerned about further issues on this sewer line.
Scarlet
Wright – Asked the Council to build a fun place downstairs in the basement for
kids to play.
Audrey
Wright – Wants the city to build a fun place in the basement for art classes
and story time and a gym.
Marisa
Wright – Says there are so many reasons to finish the basement and she thinks
we should do it for the kids.
Tonya
Edvalson - Wants City to finish what has been started with CoRec. There is need
for inside equipment. Some like solitary exercise activities. Lego League was
great for a few weeks for her son but teams got kicked out of CoRec facility a
lot because of other events scheduled. If we have money to do it then we should
do it.
Robert
Chesworth - President of the Bridgestone HOA. Wants to back up Mr. Brown's
concern with the sewer line. Until issue is fixed there will continue to be problems.
Angela
Johnson - Really encourages Council to consider the decision on the basement.
Feels like we've only portrayed whether or not the basement should be finished,
not what else the money could be used for. Nobody is talking about the $3m
recreation impact fees already spent. There is a $1.1m deficit on utility bond,
we had to settle a lawsuit, and other expenses have come up. Asked the Council
to please not spend any more money. Realizes that we'd have more classes, but
we need to decide if two extra rooms are really worth $400,000 and will this
facility ever really make a profit. There will be ongoing costs with utilities,
additional staff, and equipment. Asked the Council to please try to reduce
costs.
Paul
Hales - Anxious to get involved and hear details on the building. Look at
building and it's hard to imagine it used to be a tent and double wide trailer.
We've overcome a lot of hurdles to get to this point and feels like giving up
now is like stopping at the ten yard line. Home values are going back up. Local
economy is strong. Would love to have a resource in Cedar Hills for exercise.
Ken
Cromar - Congrats to Lone Peak and Coach Lewis. Appreciated the autism
awareness day information. Says city published documents that golf course was
profitable but it isn't. Golf Course Finance Advisory Committee showed golf
course is being subsidized $550,000 per year. He says the record has never been
corrected. Wants to know if City ever intends on putting golf course losses on the
front page of the newsletter. Wants mayor to correct the record and publicize.
Review/Action
Recognizing Quincy Lewis as Cedar Hills Champion
From
the press release - As part of the Cedar Hills Champions program, the
City Council will recognize Quincy Lewis for his role as the boys basketball
coach at Lone Peak High School, where he has been the coach for 10 years.
Mr. Lewis led the Lone Peak Knights through an impressive
season this year, which ended with the Knights crowned as the national
basketball champions for 2013. He has also led the basketball team through five
state championships in the past six years. In 2012 Mr. Lewis was inducted into
the Wagner College Athletics Hall of Fame where he played basketball from
1991-1993.
Quincy has been recognized nationally as Naismith Boy’s
High School Coach of the Year and MaxPreps 2013 National Coach of the Year at
the same time that the Lone Peak Knights were named the MaxPreps 2013 Xcellent
25 National Champions. In Utah Governor Herbert has declared March 8th
as Lone Peak Basketball Day.
“Quincy is an inspiring leader,” said Mayor Gary Gygi. “He
has shown an incredible amount of commitment to the sport, but especially to
the boys he coaches. We appreciate the time and effort he gives to the youth in
our city. We are honored to have him represent our community and are pleased to
recognize him as a Cedar Hills Champion.”
The resolution recognizing Quincy was unanimously
approved.
Review/Action
on Declaring Autism Awareness Day
From
the press release - On April 23rd the City Council proclaimed April
25, 2013 as Autism Awareness Day in Cedar Hills. April is known nationally as
Autism Awareness Month.
Autism
is a complex developmental disability that typically appears during the first
three years of life and affects a person’s ability to communicate and interact
with others. Autism is defined by a certain set of behaviors and is a “spectrum
disorder” that affects individuals differently and to varying degrees. There is
no known single cause of autism. In March 212, the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention concluded that the prevalence of autism had risen to 1 in every
88 births in the Untied Sated and almost 1 in 54 boys. Currently, the Autism
Society estimates that the lifetime cost for caring for a child with autism
ranges from $3.5 million to $5 million, and that the United States is facing
almost $90 billion annually in costs for autism. The Autism Awareness Ribbon,
which consists of several colorful puzzle pieces, is the most recognized symbol
of the autism community in the world.
"We
are happy to make this proclamation as a small way to raise awareness in our
community," stated Mayor Gary Gygi. "Autism affects millions around
the world and even many in our city. We encourage residents to learn more about
autism and to find ways to support those in our community who struggle with
this disability."
The
Autism Society is the nation’s leading grassroots autism organization and
exists to improve the lives of all affected by autism. This is done by
increasing public awareness about the day-to-day issues faced by people on the
spectrum, advocating for appropriate services for individuals across the
lifespan, and providing the latest information regarding treatment, education,
research and advocacy. Additional information may be found online at http://www.autism-society.org.
Resident
Tonya Edvalson spoke and gave further information on autism. This resolution
was unanimously approved.
City
Reports
CM
Martinez - Family Festival underway. Rec programs are going well. YCC has
openings so youth should submit applications.
CM
Zappala - Working on app for budget and will work with CM Rees to issue a press
release.
CM
Augustus - ULCT conference was great. Next work session he would like to talk
about some of the information given. North Pointe is going to start taking
green waste soon. On the Planning Commission Tonya Edvalson has asked to be
removed from committee. Waste Management will be coming to meet with Council
soon.
CM
Rees - Issued press releases and working on more for Arbor Day activities and
Murdock Trail grand opening.
Consent
Agenda
The
minutes from the March 26, 2013 and April 2, 2013 Council meetings were unanimously
approved.
Review/Action
on Preliminary Bridgestone Plat F & G
Planning
Commission approved plans for Plat F & G with condition that Garbett Homes
add more brick to the buildings. They are aware of the sewer line issue brought
up by Mr. Brown and will work to avoid that line. Rich with Garbett Homes
presented. Is excited that Garbett is coming to Utah County. Purchased these
lots from Perry Homes. Planning on building nine buildings between Harvey and
Bridgestone Drive. One building that already has foundation will stay
consistent with old design, but newer buildings will not have underground
garages. Because there were some drawings not previously submitted to the
Council for review this item was tabled until the next meeting.
Review/Action
on Amendment on City Code Regarding Assisted Living Facilities
The
code was updated to remove the minimum distance requirement from similar
facilities. This was required to be compliant with State laws. This was
unanimously approved.
Review/Action
on Resolution to Adjust Common Boundaries (Earl Property)
The
City received a request from the Earls to boundary adjust into Cedar Hills from
Pleasant Grove. A public hearing was previously held and a request has also
been filed with Pleasant Grove. This was unanimously approved.
Review/Action
on Amendment Regarding Elections
The
City Recorder had found some outdated information in the city code with regards
to campaign finance disclosure requirements and definitions. The updated
ordinance will bring the code into compliance with state code. She also
recommended a Declaration of Candidacy Filing Fee of $35.00 be added to cover
the cost of staff and supplies. This is common in other cities. This item was
unanimously approved.
Review/Action
on CoRec Basement Bid
Public Comment
Jill
Griffiths - Really enjoys having recreation here. She teaches rec classes at
the facility and is also a golfer. If we want to support our community then we
need to stay true to the name of the building. Numbers have dropped because no
classes on Fridays or Saturdays because of events. Basement would give more
freedom, cleaner place to be, and an actual fitness schedule. Zumbatonic
numbers have dropped but kids who attend love the class. Amazing place for kids
and families. Suggestion is to facilitate a fitness room and maybe not build
other room right now. Maybe we don't need office space or conference room.
Fitness room would be creating recreation and meeting goal of making this
building a rec building.
Emily
Flygare - Wants to encourage finishing basement. Loves fitness classes and
wishes there were more. Floor is very slippery and no mirrors and not enough
equipment. A fitness room that is more usable and safer would increase numbers.
Doesn't have time to attend AF or PG classes. Son takes karate classes. Would
be sad if classes were cancelled. Thinks city needs and deserves this. Thinks
it will be profitable. Hopes there will be a sidewalk of some sort going to rec
center.
Laurie
Johnson - Likes the area and loves the center, it is beautiful. Concern is that
things promised to residents when moved into area have not been finished, such
as park on her street. Little kids who could be playing in park are playing in
streets. Would like to see some of those projects being finished with this
money. Would like it if we would not spend all money on basement or take more
time to consider other options. Would like to see other projects and promises
fulfilled before rec center.
Anna
Mitchell - Enjoys rec center and grateful it has been built and we have
classes. Building is used for fitness classes, golf, story time, dinner,
council meetings so it's not just a recreation center. Loves coming because
it's a great place and has a wonderful feeling. If there is more to offer
through the basement then numbers will increase. Provides a sense of community.
Discussion
The
low bid for the buildout came to $364,000. This includes the finish of
approximately 3,200 sq ft of existing basement area and 1,600 sq ft of new
construction including a storage area, conference room, two offices, and
elevator. Also included are store-front style main doors with additional
walkway and railing installed at Sammy’s. There is an alternate addition of
$3,194 to replace the existing counters and sinks in the restrooms.
Finance
Director Charl Lowe presented on how this would be funded. He is estimating the
entire project will be around $410,000, which includes furnishing for the new
conference rooms and offices. This does not include any recreation equipment.
He estimates $20,000 for architecture fee, $370,000 for construction, and
$20,000 for furnishings. The funds that will be used are $120,421 from previous
CARE tax and current year projected CARE tax, and $289,579 from unrestricted
funds.
CM
Martinez stated we’ve been talking about basement for over a year. Had townhall
meeting and has been on agenda many times. Has been a discussion on the forum.
It's been good and bad that basement wasn't finished when building was
originally built. We've had issues because of conflict between recreation and
events. She has high expectations for recreation.
I
was opposed to awarding the bid at this time. Here is an outline of my
reasoning:
1.
Expansion
a. Last year we had a public hearing on the basement and solicited feedback on 4 options.
b. Overall, the majority of residents preferred Option B.
c. At the December 18th meeting we as a Council decided to send out to bid Option B, which included a basic finish of both sides of the basement and an optional elevator.
d. We were told the goal was simply to move recreation downstairs so the upstairs could be used exclusively for events.
e. The item sent out to bid was not what the Council had voted on and includes not only the basement finish but an expansion of the main floor and several changes to existing features.
f. We were given this information on Friday and have been given 4 days to now vote.
g. The information being relayed to residents is that the $374,000 bid is for the basement and to increase our recreation. In truth, it includes more than finishing the basement and some of it will not bring additional recreation to the building. In fact, the only thing the basement construction does is allow us to move existing classes downstairs.
2. Financials
a. The final approval for the existing building was $2.1m, yet the analysis David performed this week shows that we spent over $2.7m on the building as is.
b. Residents were told the building as is would serve as a rec center, an events center, and a golf clubhouse but are now being told we have to spend more money to make recreation work.
c. Our outdoor recreation classes are doing very well. The indoor rec classes are struggling and losing money. Now we are considering adding more cost, both one time and ongoing to the portion that is struggling already.
d. The $374,000 does not include any furniture or any recreation equipment.
e. Even if we were to spend additional funds for equipment, it will always be difficult to compete with Anytime Fitness and PG rec center who charge about the same per month as we do yet offer much more with regards to fitness.
3. Resident Feedback
a. We recently passed an ordinance that would require any new building exceeding $400,000 to go to a vote of the citizens in order to get feedback. This expansion is going to cost $410,000 by Charl’s analysis (this includes construction, architect fees, and furniture for the new offices and conference room) so we should attempt to get as much feedback as possible through an online survey.
b. While we had a public hearing last year to show 4 different options for the basement we have never put together an analysis showing how much money we have available in unrestricted funds and all the options on how it could be spent. We should do so and give residents an opportunity to give feedback on how it should be spent.
c. On a recent survey performed we received 366 responses from residents. It would be nice to get a similar number of responses on a project of this size.
d. On the Facebook recreation page a resident asked to see the plans in advance of the meeting and was told they would only be made available once the Council approves. Where is the transparency we have been pushing for?
e. In the Decisions 2011 survey when asked if the City should provide adult recreation programs 35% said yes and 60% said no. When asked if they were provided if residents would participate 29% said yes and 65% said no. These numbers align with what we are seeing happening with classes.
4. Conclusion
a. The existing building is already way over budget and we do not have any recreation impact fees left. Not only has it cost more financially than was planned, but it has caused upset feelings among many in the community who felt they didn't have a voice on how the funds were spent. Some were even on a committee and made a recommendation for these funds and feel the Council ignored the recommendation.
b. Using our unrestricted funds for this will be at the cost of other projects. For example, three years ago the residents on Bayhill presented the Council with a petition asking that the Bayhill park be completed before their kids were too old to enjoy it. They were told that there were not funds for this project. You can imagine the frustration being expressed that there are unrestricted funds available to keep working on the rec center but not for this park that has been promised for some time.
c. During our campaigning we all talked about communication and getting resident feedback. This is our opportunity to prove we are serious about that.
d. This basement may be the best option and what our residents want over any other projects. We should take two weeks to do a survey and at least give residents an opportunity to let us know. We know that asking residents to attend Council meeting or public hearings has not usually been effective as we get a handful of residents who come. It doesn’t make sense to me that we continue to use that as the primary option for resident feedback knowing it doesn’t work. Let’s at least try to get more feedback via an online and anonymous survey.
5. Suggestion
a. Prepare an analysis of what unrestricted funds we have set aside and all the ways they can be utilized.
b. Create an online survey with this information and highly publicize.
c. Come back in two weeks and make a decision with more resident feedback.
a. Last year we had a public hearing on the basement and solicited feedback on 4 options.
b. Overall, the majority of residents preferred Option B.
c. At the December 18th meeting we as a Council decided to send out to bid Option B, which included a basic finish of both sides of the basement and an optional elevator.
d. We were told the goal was simply to move recreation downstairs so the upstairs could be used exclusively for events.
e. The item sent out to bid was not what the Council had voted on and includes not only the basement finish but an expansion of the main floor and several changes to existing features.
f. We were given this information on Friday and have been given 4 days to now vote.
g. The information being relayed to residents is that the $374,000 bid is for the basement and to increase our recreation. In truth, it includes more than finishing the basement and some of it will not bring additional recreation to the building. In fact, the only thing the basement construction does is allow us to move existing classes downstairs.
2. Financials
a. The final approval for the existing building was $2.1m, yet the analysis David performed this week shows that we spent over $2.7m on the building as is.
b. Residents were told the building as is would serve as a rec center, an events center, and a golf clubhouse but are now being told we have to spend more money to make recreation work.
c. Our outdoor recreation classes are doing very well. The indoor rec classes are struggling and losing money. Now we are considering adding more cost, both one time and ongoing to the portion that is struggling already.
d. The $374,000 does not include any furniture or any recreation equipment.
e. Even if we were to spend additional funds for equipment, it will always be difficult to compete with Anytime Fitness and PG rec center who charge about the same per month as we do yet offer much more with regards to fitness.
3. Resident Feedback
a. We recently passed an ordinance that would require any new building exceeding $400,000 to go to a vote of the citizens in order to get feedback. This expansion is going to cost $410,000 by Charl’s analysis (this includes construction, architect fees, and furniture for the new offices and conference room) so we should attempt to get as much feedback as possible through an online survey.
b. While we had a public hearing last year to show 4 different options for the basement we have never put together an analysis showing how much money we have available in unrestricted funds and all the options on how it could be spent. We should do so and give residents an opportunity to give feedback on how it should be spent.
c. On a recent survey performed we received 366 responses from residents. It would be nice to get a similar number of responses on a project of this size.
d. On the Facebook recreation page a resident asked to see the plans in advance of the meeting and was told they would only be made available once the Council approves. Where is the transparency we have been pushing for?
e. In the Decisions 2011 survey when asked if the City should provide adult recreation programs 35% said yes and 60% said no. When asked if they were provided if residents would participate 29% said yes and 65% said no. These numbers align with what we are seeing happening with classes.
4. Conclusion
a. The existing building is already way over budget and we do not have any recreation impact fees left. Not only has it cost more financially than was planned, but it has caused upset feelings among many in the community who felt they didn't have a voice on how the funds were spent. Some were even on a committee and made a recommendation for these funds and feel the Council ignored the recommendation.
b. Using our unrestricted funds for this will be at the cost of other projects. For example, three years ago the residents on Bayhill presented the Council with a petition asking that the Bayhill park be completed before their kids were too old to enjoy it. They were told that there were not funds for this project. You can imagine the frustration being expressed that there are unrestricted funds available to keep working on the rec center but not for this park that has been promised for some time.
c. During our campaigning we all talked about communication and getting resident feedback. This is our opportunity to prove we are serious about that.
d. This basement may be the best option and what our residents want over any other projects. We should take two weeks to do a survey and at least give residents an opportunity to let us know. We know that asking residents to attend Council meeting or public hearings has not usually been effective as we get a handful of residents who come. It doesn’t make sense to me that we continue to use that as the primary option for resident feedback knowing it doesn’t work. Let’s at least try to get more feedback via an online and anonymous survey.
5. Suggestion
a. Prepare an analysis of what unrestricted funds we have set aside and all the ways they can be utilized.
b. Create an online survey with this information and highly publicize.
c. Come back in two weeks and make a decision with more resident feedback.
This item passed 4-1.
Resolution
on Changing Clubhouse Drive to Recreation Drive
A
request was received to change the street name of Clubhouse Drive to something
that would more accurately reflect the use of the Community Recreation Center. The
suggestion was to change it to Recreation Drive. CM Augustus would like more
community involvement in the renaming of the street. Would like to have a
contest with schools and also put it in the newsletter. He will work on this so
the item was tabled.
FY
2014 Budget Presentation
A
few highlights:
·
Health
insurance premiums are increasing 5.2%
·
Average
pay increase was 4%
·
Anticipated
decrease in legal services - $50,000
· This
is an election year so we need to budget for election expenses - $13,500
·
Fire
services are increasing by $15,900
·
Police
services are increasing by $12,688
·
Golf
subsidy is staying at $65,000
·
Planned
subsidy for library reimbursement, Family Festival, and YCC is $41,800
·
Planned
subsidy for recreation classes is $49,500
·
No
funds for a Decisions Survey this year
·
Administrative
salary and wages are down as we are no longer paying severance for past
employees
Resolution
to Create Family Festival Committee
Earlier
the Mayor put together a citizens advisory committee to oversee the annual
family festival celebration. This will reduce the amount of time staff will be
involved, which frees them up to focus on other city items. Some changes to the
wording will be made (changing vice chair to committee member, changing
chair-elect to future chair, clarifying how a new chair is selected if they
resign). This item was unanimously approved with the suggested wording changes.
Review/Action
on Events Center Contract
The
City was approached by someone who wishes to serve alcoholic beverages during a
private event in the Vista room. The proposal was made to allow private groups
to serve alcohol. Alcohol will not be served by the City and the City will not
be obtaining a liquor license. The event agreement would be updated to include
the rules with allowing alcohol to be served.
The
entire Council agreed that there wasn’t a concern with people abusing alcohol
at the events. Most felt the Council should not restrict personal freedoms by prohibiting
alcohol consumption. I don’t have any issue with people drinking alcohol and do
not think we are going to have issues at the Vista Room. My reason for voting
no on this is because it is a public building built with public funds and also
used as a family gathering spot. It is different than Walmart or Harts, both
private companies. I would hate to alienate any resident who decides not to use
the facility because alcohol may be served in the next room, especially since
tax dollars keep this building going. Secondly, this is the first time we’ve
been asked to allow alcohol in the 12 months the facility has been open. I know
there are going to be many residents in the city who will be upset if alcohol
is served at the CoRec, regardless of who is serving it, and it doesn’t seem
worth the contention or negative PR for the few events that may want alcohol.
This
item passed 4-1.
Discussion
on St. Andrews Property
We
have been approached by a developer who may be interested in purchasing this
property. Currently the area is zoned residential. The Council asked for this
item to go the Planning Commission to review the possibility of rezoning it to
a mixed use or commercial development.
Discussion
on Sale of Lots on Cottonwood Drive
There
are seven residential lots located on Cottonwood Drive that are owned by the
City. The lots are fully developed and can be marketed for immediate sale. We have
seen a rise in interest in building in Cedar Hills so the recommendation is
that we have a market analysis performed to determine the value of the lots and
possibly put then up for sale. No decision was made as this is a discussion
item only.
No comments:
Post a Comment